Consistency is one of those words that gets used a lot in mastering, and misunderstood just as often. For some people, consistency means everything should be the same level. For others, it means matching tone from song to song. Sometimes it’s taken to mean removing contrast altogether. That’s not what consistency is for.

In mastering, consistency isn’t about sameness. It’s about making sure the music translates, while still feeling like itself.

By the time a record reaches mastering, most of the obvious creative decisions have already been made.

  • The songs are written.
  • The performances are captured.
  • The mixes are approved.

From the outside, that can make mastering look purely technical, like a final polish, a checklist, a quality-control pass before release. But that view misses something essential.

Stereo and immersive formats aren’t a hierarchy. They’re different tools, designed for different listening experiences. One isn’t automatically more advanced, more professional, or more artistically valid than the other. The right format is the one that serves the song.

Before I touch an EQ, compressor, limiter, or anything else, I listen.

That might sound obvious, but it’s worth saying out loud — because the first listen tells me more than any meter ever will. In the first 30 seconds, I’m not trying to fix anything. I’m trying to understand what the record is already doing, and what it’s trying to be.

Those first impressions set the foundation for every decision that follows.

For a long time, louder felt like the goal. If your track hit harder than the next one, it grabbed the listener's attention. That mindset made sense when playback systems were inconsistent and volume was a competitive advantage. That’s no longer the world we’re releasing music into.

Today, louder doesn’t mean what it used to. And in many cases, pushing level too far actually works against the music.

What Audio Mastering Can and Can’t Fix. Understanding that distinction is one of the biggest factors in whether a mastering session feels smooth and productive, or frustrating and disappointing. At its core, mastering is about translation, consistency, and intent.

July 11th, 2005 is a date I will always remember. I can hardly believe it was 20 years ago. It was my first day as a full-time mastering engineer. I tell the story often during public speaking engagements responding to the "How did you get your start?" question. It begins in December of 2004 during a mastering session with Kris Kimura for his Shue's Cafe record.